High Hopes
On Friday, October 9th, 2009, ‘The Norwegian Nobel Committee’ has decided to award the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize to President Barack Obama “for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between people”. Reactions for such nomination have varied between welcoming and fury among people not only inside the U.S.A. but also worldwide. I am concerned by going behind the nomination in this post.
War and Peace
I believe people every where are looking for avoiding War and achieving Peace that is accompanied by Justice; something that we are lacking for since World War II. This was the main reason for establishing the U.N. in 1945 however it has not been achieved for many reasons that can be summed-up into the vision of people towards the future and how it is reflected on the ground in terms of strategies and action plans.
Rise and Fall
During the past decade(s), many nations rendered a negative political image of the United Stats which went dramatically to the bottom rock in the past 8 years due to the impact of the strategy implemented by successive administration(s) that affected other nations worldwide in the different fields of ‘Politics’, ‘Geopolitics’, ‘Economy’, ‘Climatic Change’, ‘Nuclear Disarmament’, ‘Arms Conduct’, ‘Terrorism’, ‘Democracy’ and ‘Human Rights’.
Nevertheless since he ran for presidential elections, Obama caught the attention of the globe by a ‘new language’ as a politician that aims to change this beside the main issues that are important to any American citizen at home who are not concerned about global-politics.
The implementation of such ‘new language’ that Obama is speaking before and after running for presidency has straight impact on the previously mentioned issues which became vital in the 21st century, and simply this is -in my opinion- why the nomination literally came after 11 days of his residence in the While House as President and before 4 months of his speech in Cairo to the Muslim World in June 4th, 2009 which shaped many aspects of his strategy.
But ...
On the ground, we still have 2 open wars in ‘Iraq’ and ‘Afghanistan’ that has no meaning from the beginning. I may understand that they are the legacy of Bush Administration but this means more death tolls for nothing particular. On the other hand, talking about Middle East Conflict, maybe it can not be solved that simple after more than 60 years however the very basic thing is not to ignore the way Israel is dealing there; I may understand that there are problems among the Palestinians but any human being can not ignore that there is no particular reason for the Israeli actions especially during Lebanon War (2006), Gaza War (2008/2009) & same goes for other occupied land so it is important to see the situation clearly.
People not Icons
Humans are always looking for good people who guide them for achieving noble things and this is rooted in the subconscious of people regardless the culture via literature in case it is not achieved on ground.
So despite understanding the enthusiasm of the noble committee to urge Obama on following up with his strategy, I am afraid that this can be nothing more than making an ‘icon’ unless every body -especially leaders- stand up for their responsibility to achieve a better situation after many decades of downfall on the human level.
Responsibilities
Maybe it is not that clear for many people however I see Obama -as personnel- has already been placed as a remark in the human history. However I am aware that ruling USA is not a ‘one man show’ but rather is a constitutional framework that has many branches which means more responsibilities and pressure to be placed on the administration’s shoulder after this prize. Nevertheless I think this responsibility is distributed among all of the leaders not only Obama because he is only the 44th president of the United States not of every single nation.
Consequently, to achieve what this prize aims to support, there are thousand miles everybody has to go before they sleep. This simply means more cooperation between people which we have not seen yet in the past decades by any means in terms of politics and its impact on the ground in the issues mentioned up. Such cooperation can not be done unless people are aware about understanding each other, as I wrote 3 years ago in I-MAG Magazine.
In a nutshell, this is what I believe as the real message behind such nomination or else we shall discover that we are just reading another good novel. Future shall tell us and hopefully not!
“The artist is nothing without the gift, but the gift is nothing without work.” ~ [Emile Zola]
Related Posts
Related Articles
- Beyond Enemy Lines [English]
Related Media
[Can not see the video? Check it over YouTube]
Light at the End of the Tunnel
This post is not for quick scanning so take your time in reading. Yesterday was the 8th anniversary of the horrible September 11th, 2001 attacks known as 9/11. I am still horrified by the shear magnitude of the tragedy either for the event itself or the aftermath during the past 8 years.
Trilogy of Pain
I blogged about this in the 7th anniversary last year, so in this year I am blogging from another angle which is the pain I felt during the past 8 years. It was a ternary one in the matter of fact as follows:
- 1st Pain: As any human being, I shared the pain with either families of victims or survivors and cannot find any word to share with them except that the terrorists who commit this should be punished.
- 2nd Pain: When a normal crime in a society happen we cannot call it anything but crime, hence, when a terroristic attack took place, we cannot call it anything but terrorism. I prefer clear terminology and against any other description for what happened especially by extremists.
- 3rd Pain: I am aware that there are some Muslims who ‘interpret’ their own version of Islam to serve their dirty purpose but to portray all Muslims being terrorists without knowing nothing about Islam was bad indeed.
I respect everybody and believe in the freedom of choice for people to believe in whatever they want to and not to force people into following anything generally and religion specially because everybody is simply unique and humans have minds to think about whatever.
This is simply what Islam calls for and hence any other version, known as the stereotyped image, is not true, however during the administration of President Bush, lights were spotted on this stereotyped image whereas same lights were dimmed on the real image which was something strange for me.
Interaction
Nevertheless, despite welcoming what he said of course, I felt quite strange when President Obama gave his speech in Cairo University on June 4th, 2009 simply because what the POTUS mentioned was as if he read my article that I wrote back in June 2008 and published in I-MAG Magazine.
I interpret this simply as a representation for the difference between someone who is looking forward to engaging people and someone who is not, without -of course- letting down the right of compensation for the victims because again what happened is an unforgivin terrorism from some people who got it wrong all the way.
Consequently, justice is justice everywhere and humans are humans everywhere who should be protected and live in a healthy way. Coexistence is the key to live together in parallel to placing a critique for any volatilisation for human values via stereotyped images from whoever regarding wherever and whatever. I am aware that No utopia yet still we work on better.
In a nutshell, this post is open for all of you; place your tribute, place your thoughts or even read without commenting. I am looking forward to read your thoughts and if you wish, check my last year post + my article.
“The time to repair the roof is when the sun is shinning.” ~ [John F. Kennedy]
Related Posts
Related Articles
- In the Middle of Nowhere [English]
Lockerbie: Who deceived Who?
One week ago, I read the news about releasing Abdelbaset Ali Mohamed Al-Megrahi who was convicted in bombing ‘Pan Am Flight 103 (London-New York)’ over Scottish town of Lockerbie on 21st December 1988 which resulted in killing the people on board of the flight plus other 11 on the ground so the death toll was 270.
At the beginning, I thought it was either a joke or flying kite to see the reaction, however when Scottish government released him yesterday on 20th August 2009, I felt very disappointed indeed.
In his statement, Scottish Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill said that he took the decision of releasing him on 'compassionate grounds' since Al-Megrahi is diagnosed with prostate cancer and he -MacAskill- thought it is better for the man to die in home since "Our justice system demands that judgement be imposed, but compassion be available."
Either .. OR!
I do respect judges everywhere, believe in the value of every single human bing, anti-violence. However, in this case, excuse my ignorance; it seems we have been deceived because it has only one of the two following faces:
- One > the man is guilty: If so, then he should complete his 27-year-punishment in jail. Mercy for him can be shown in any way but releasing him because where was his mercy when he intentionally bombed the flight?
- Two > the man is innocent: If so, I wonder why USA/UK caused us headache for 20 years by condemning Libya. Hence all the evidences provided about this case are fake?
I would have been happy if the court released him for being innocent and hence corrected a horrible mistake of sending a man behind jails for nothing, but this did not occur. Consequently, I would have been happy if the court refused his appeal because he is a terrorist who bombed the flight with no mercy for the families of victims but this did not occur either.
On the other hand, let us play the What If game: what if this man was Bin Laden or Oklahoma City bomber, would any court release them ‘on compassionate grounds?’ I doubt because no mercy for anyone who killed people intentionally regardless his faith, or race.
Credibility
Is it clear now why I am disappointed? It is simply because I see a foggy situation where truth is disappearing behind masks of naïve values. How can we be sure about the credibility of any case in the future? I put myself in the shoes of the family victims and ask where and who is the real terrorist in this case?
Ladies and Gentlemen: In a nutshell, the real value of Justice is securing people -victims + their families- by compensating from murderers / terrorists because other than that is simply being naïve or else what is the point of justice system then?
I am very sorry for the 20 years that have been simply lost in less than 2 minutes!
Justice delayed is justice denied. ~ [William E. Gladstone]
Related Links
Related Posts










































