Hicham Maged's blog Inquisitive curiosity paves knowledge path

Curiosity & Knowledge enlighten our Minds!
Apr252009Off

Sorry in the Human Nature!

I have not forgotten my journey within the nature of people as it is still going on in different stages. If you recall, the first phase was wandering in the wonderland of human nature, the second phase was booking places under the sun of human nature, the third phase was trying to understand the language of human nature that is implemented during various human interaction, and here in this blog entry we reached the 4th phase where I wonder about why sorry seems to be the hardest word among people or simply the apology attitude in a wide perspective.

Sorry in the Human Nature

Sorry in the Human Nature

Strange but true: when you hear people complain about their partner who does not care about them whether they are married couples or close friends, whereas when their partner meet with any stranger, you find it easy for them to apologize if something went wrong!

Hence in close relationships, sorry seems to be the hardest word, but why? Well, if we look at any community, people interact with each other according to a scenario where everybody tries maximizing his (and her) share of happiness in parallel with minimizing his (and her) share of sadness, so in this scenario I think we have two prototypes of people:

  1. Wealthy People: those who are capable of accepting the existence of the others in their life;
  2. Poor People: those who are not capable or can hardly accept the existence of the others in their life.

As for the first prototype: “wealthy people” are the ones with open-minded mentalities, which make them aware about the fact of not living alone. Hereby, they understand that as they do welcome happiness and reject sadness, the others around want the same thing too. Hence, in this prototype, they try to achieve a state of balance between their own needs and other needs in a clever way, which simply means do following an ethical guide.

As for the second prototype: “poor people” are the one with narrow-minded mentalities, who forgot about the fact of not living alone. Hereby, they hardly understand that their way of gaining happiness might hurt others in case it defects their rights Furthermore, they try to distribute their share of sadness among the others. Hence, in this prototype, they do not care about the others and treat them in a stupid way which simply means following no ethical guide.

In the light of this, the words wealthy people and poor people can be understood in terms personality not in terms of financial income or inheritance. Hence, you may have a sum of money that make you wealthy in the eyes of society but when you step over the others for your happiness your are poor person – and vice versa indeed.

It is quiet strange how pride and prejudice shade human nature, however this feeling fades out under the lights of what I always emphasize upon: love is the core of this process because when people love each other they will care and vice versa! This is my view for sorry in the human nature from another perspective.

In a nutshell, it is up to everybody to select either being wealthy or poor in the light of what I mentioned in this blog entry, so which prototype of them you belong to? This is one of many questions we are called to ask ourselves individually! Furthermore, this reminds me with a hadith for Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) that states the following:

Love for your brother what you love for yourself. — Muhammad (pbuh)

« photo credit »

Tags:
Categories: Coexistence
Viewd: 2,148 views
Why?HummMaybe!Okay :)Salam :P (9 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

author/post info Published by Hicham Maged on April 25, 2009 - 7:30 PM
About Author: I am a Muslim-Arab-Egyptian person living on planet Earth; since I wonder and ponder therefore I am!

Enjoy this article?
You can subscribe to my RSS feed via reader, receive e-mail updates
and publicize the post over social networks that you like.

Comments (16) Trackbacks (2)
  1. I didn’t get where you were going with the wealthy and poor analogies until I read the entire thing.I would have to agree with you and have to say that is a very nice way of explaining things.Regards!

  2. I found your article to be interesting but I think the labels for your two types of people should be different. “Wealthy” and “poor” just associates too much with actual themes of wealth and money. So its hard not to glance at that and read it as if all poor people don’t except the existence of other people in their life.. At least that’s my opinion.

    Cindy

  3. This is an excellent post and I enjoyed it. Unfortunately, today many people only watch himself and them do not interest the happiness of others. I would like to change the situation and that we begin to function as human beings.

  4. “Love for your brother what you love for yourself.” I like this quote. It’s the epitome of selflessness. I think ‘wealthy’ people are selfless–that’s why they could accept other people into their lives. I’d like to think that I’m a ‘wealthy’ person but only fifty-fifty. There are some people that I really couldn’t ‘swallow’ so I just try to ignore them as much as I could. Thank you for such insightful blogs.

  5. Interesting. I like the post.

    Where is the line, though, for being accepting that others have the ability to MAKE choices versus your acceptance that those choices are correct?

  6. Sorry for not putting the correct link in last post. Too little sleep, too much caffeine, and a May 31st editing deadline. Bouncing around blogs is maybe not the best break to take.

    Hope you are well,

    -Tim

    Tim Singleton’s last blog post..Green Day

  7. Ah, here is another great post of yours Hicham, traveling inside the human nature is not easy my friend, the problem is we see from different angles!

    some people would apologize because they know it’s a shortcut!

    Hesham’s last blog post..Once Chance.. One Comment.. Too many Gifts and Traffic for your Blog

  8. Of all the people who commented on this post, I’m afraid I’m the only one to disagree(so far). Values like loving for your brother what you would love for yourself and all the selfless acts are mere covers of deeper and lower held instincts…unconsciously of course. To treat ethics as the relation between one and society, I believe to be ignoring the whole point of ethics. But individualism and spirituality are what ethics should aim at. If you would like to know more about what I’m talking about, you’re welcome to read the story im posting through my blogg.

    Amrhima’s last blog post..Encountering Nietzsche: Beyond Good and Evil (Chapter 3)

    • Amrhima: I’m interested in your point of view, and sure have no problem that you beg to differ with me.

      What I presented here is just an inquistive query to the human nature since the personnel is the core of society as I believe, so you’ll not find me always implementing the normal diffenitions/concepts of things as we used to read, learn and understand.

      Of course, I’ll make sure to drop by your blog; it sounds interesting since it deals with philosophy.

  9. Thank you for a very insightful and interesting post. It’s really nice to find articles about philosophical issues which affect everyone. I have always thought of this dichotomy in terms of ‘generous spirited people’ and ‘mean spritited people’ but I think we’re on the same page.
    Liam Alexander’s last blog ..Twitter Weekly Updates for 2009-06-07 My ComLuv Profile

  10. I think perhaps the context of how ‘sorry’ is used in todays society is somewhat misplaced, or misunderstood. I don’t think the reality(truth-past the social order of things)of an apology lies in making others happy, nor reducing their sadness nor I think the heart of forgiveness lies in who the person is, in accordance with their status in society, as people differ and are not always who you think, just by how much or how short off income they live by. Personality is not always the ruler of this, simply being human is. I feel an apology lies in the actual heart of the experience, and what the person has learnt about themselfs through it, rather than be used to please others just for the sake of saying it. The apology is more of a thank you to the other person, for allowing us, in ourselfs to see the truth.
    Ana’s last blog ..Wordless Wednesday #6 Musical Energy My ComLuv Profile

    • I understand your point of view and it’s interesting indeed.

      What you said is something can not be reached by the majority of people because it lies at the deep ocean of human interaction. However in todays society -whatever- people are kept themsevles grounded into the very detail of mundane life and selfish attitude to the point that they almost forgot about the very simple meaning of being ‘sorry’ that floats over the surface of human interaction.

  11. I liked what I read up, really fantastic (Y)

    Best Regards

Sorry, comments for this entry are closed. You are welcomed to comment on from your blog/website.