Say FGM not FC!
Man is totally different from Woman, either physically or mentally so there is no equality between them; rather there is integration which can not occur unless they are different. In electricity; in order for the current to flow, the positive protons meet with the negative electrons, if they are the same then welcome Mrs. Darkness.
Same is applied in human society or this is what is should be; Man and Woman integrates together for fulfilling the reason of creation which is urbanising Earth, this simply means that equality is in rights and obligations however they are not alike.
So what about circumcision?
It is the same case of not alike. Male Circumcision -which is known as “Khitan” in Arabic- is an obligatory act for men in Islam and the other divine religions. However as for women, I do not feminise the term to be “Female Circumcision” (FC) for three reasons:
- Juristically: no cite that Islam had marked it as an obligatory act for women;
- Linguistically, the week hadith that told about had implemented the term “Khifad” not “Khitan”;
- Technically; what is practised for men is totally different from what is practised for women.
So I prefer to use the term FGM which is shorthand for “Female Genital Mutilation”. It is a four degrees procedure that ascends from excising of the prepuce to the excision of the female genital parts or even cauterisation.
As for the hadith of Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) to a Woman named Umm Attiyah -which is doubted by the majority of Muslim scholars- states that:“If you circumcise do not go deep (i.e. do not encroach on the clitoris) because it would be useful to the wife and desirable to the husband.”
A careful reading might reveal the truth. Here the case of equality appears; women have the equal right of having their desire fulfilled exactly as men within framework of marriage in the Muslim society.
On the other hand, in case this hadith implemented, the Kihfad is supposed to be limited-like physicians say- for the abnormal cases found in some females which require a surgery to excise the undesired appendage. Consequently, according to the hadith itself if implemented, I see that if encroaching happened, compensation should be implemented.
By the way, Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) had four daughters named Fatimah, Zainab, Ruqayyah, and Umm Kulthum. There’s no proof or evidence that they were circumcised.
Therefore, no one has the authority to apply FGM against women in the name of protecting Miss Virginity and Mr. Traditions proclaiming that this is Islam. Sorry, this is totally wrong! This is one hand.
On the other hand, it is really disgusting that some societies sill perceive women as females whom should be excommunicated in one way or another because they are shameful, sinful and not equal in humanity to Man; Hello! they are humans like men -surprisingly for some people- with heart, soul, body and mind too.
Finally; yet the society should be based on the modesty however modesty is not implemented by applying FGM; it’s rather a comprehensive way to fulfil the purpose of creation based on the alike features of both Man and Woman. You can read more about this topic within my published article entitled “Hijab and Liberty” over the 1st issue of I-MAG Magazine via this link.
Salaam,
Hicham.
1,145 views





















(1 votes, average: 4 out of 5)






















July 25th, 2007 23:11
Woa, that was a great post.
August 20th, 2007 17:02
sir jorge:
Thanks a lot. You are mostly welcomed
August 23rd, 2007 08:32
HI SIR I AM STUDENT IN MEDICAL SCIENCES AM ALGERIENNE WOMEN YOUR WEB SITE IS VERY INTERESTNG GOOD LUCK
November 12th, 2007 12:47
Hey, we noticed that you’re from Egypt and thought you might like to check out http://www.VerveEarth.com. It’s a site for bloggers built on GoogleMaps. You can add your blog to the global voice, drive traffic, and put a widget on your blog. Cheers! -VerveEarth Team