Hicham Maged's blog Inquisitive curiosity paves knowledge path

Curiosity & Knowledge enlighten our Minds!
Apr122008Off

Hunting Freedom of Speech

I have been following the controversial regarding the case of “freedom of speech” since some time ago and found it interesting yet something vital is missing in the controversy. The concept can be summarized into the following statement: “No one should be morally persecuted for (and she) opinion regarding whatever as he (and she) is free to criticize the others even if this offend them.” Hence, In this blog entry I am looking for what is missing so let me start with some definitions of my own.

Hunting Freedom of Speech's bird

Hunting Freedom of Speech's bird

Freedom of Speech Bird: A Perspective

What about defining freedom at first? I have previously modeled this in my published article over I-MAG Magazine as follows: “freedom is as a bird that has two wings and flies within a certain medium while heading towards a final destination.” Allow me elaborate more on the terminology mentioned up:

  • The two wings are sense and responsibly.
  • The medium is the freewill of the people, and;
  • The destination is the welfare of a certain community on the minor scale, and mankind on the major one.

Hence, freedom itself is not the ultimate goal as many people think everywhere while discussing this case; rather it is the right and righteous path for reaching the desired destination. Nevertheless, the critical point which I found absent and fogged during the freedom of speech controversial is that criticizing people acts is totally different from offending them in terms of what they believe in regardless the race and religion, and this leads to hunting the bird of freedom and speech not defending!

Exposing Stereotypes and Misconceptions Cliché

On the other hand, I do believe as a Muslim that neither inspecting the beliefs nor judging people’s intentions is my ultimate business; it is none. We should rather be concerned only about two the acts which are the practiced actions that either can be right or wrong; yet only the awareness of the civil society is capable of filtering the right acts from the wrong ones and this should be broadened and not suppressed.

This shed lights on why I criticized Slaman Rushdi’s Satanic Verses, Jyllands-Posten’s Muhammad Cartoons, Greet Wilders’ Fitna Movie and any stereotyping-misconceptions products that not merely flux wrong acts committed by some Muslims with the ideology of Islam, but mainly portray “this is Islam plus this is Muhammad prefabricated cliché” This attitude of hunting freedom of speech’s bird – in the light of my perspective – makes me wonders about why people are only highlighting on this side and do not shed lights over the other one?

The other side tell us about the revelation from Almighty Allah (swt) to Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) as Mercy upon Mankind for reaching the noble goal of urbanizing Earth. This requires the integration of people who are different either on faith or race and hence welcoming the differences of our culture while looking forward for achieving respect that lead to exist together and not the contrary as we see nowadays.

In the light of this, my criticism for terrorism is harder regardless whoever committed under any race or faith. Any human being shall be anti-terrorism in case he (and she) went through using their minds in a rational way through our human intellect. Hereby, this critique is not merely because terrorism is illegal act against other humans but mainly because it reflects barrenness of terrorists to produce effective opinions and hence they used a short-cut: “kill them all” cliché.

Well Mr. Smart, I wonder what you can tell me when you know – but twist – the fact about how Islam denies terrorism since Islam encourages urbanizing Earth. Hence, this shall lead us to understand that it is neither Islam’s nor Muhammad’s fault but rather it is ignorance on both sides of Islamophobia plus ugly terrorism that acts in the scary movie and where you find extremism is committed by them as I elaborated before.

In a nutshell, I feel sorrow for those who are committing not only the generalizing sin but also the mix sin between ideologies and how some people apply their own version of them, which is much bitter indeed. We have minds to think rationally and hence our human intellect shall help us to understand better and learn how to live together!

« photo credit »

Tags: , , ,
Categories: Critiques
Viewd: 3,004 views
Why?HummMaybe!Okay :)Salam :P (19 votes, average: 4.95 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

author/post info Published by Hicham Maged on April 12, 2008 - 4:32 AM
About Author: I am a Muslim-Arab-Egyptian person living on planet Earth; since I wonder and ponder therefore I am!

Enjoy this article?
You can subscribe to my RSS feed via reader, receive e-mail updates
and publicize the post over social networks that you like.

Comments (2) Trackbacks (5)
  1. I am a Muslim and I find your BLOG and thoughts very noble and inspiring.

    Your views and thoughts are very much appreciated and a breath of fresh air.

    I will summarize mine to say that I do believe in freedom of speech, and as you greatly showed from the Qur’an, that no one should be forced to follow a certain way or view.

    However, it is generally understood in all societies that freedom of speech is not unlimited.

    I think what frustrates many that have been demonized, not just Muslims but minorities and people of other faiths, is the hypocrisy when it comes to freedom of speech in certain countries.

    Everyone understand that it is considered libel, to publish something false about a person or group of people, which damages their reputation, you can sue for that, and no one will accuse you of being against free speech. Eg, if someone spreads a message that you’re a war criminal,yet this is not true, but causes you harm and damages your reputation you have the right to take legal action.

    I’m not sure when it comes to Muslims, why the first reaction of many is to accuse Muslims of being against free speech, especially when many things are being written about us as Muslims, and the origins of our religions that makes people hate us, much of which is completely untrue and not accepted by the academic world.

    Another concern is that, if a person from a certain race or religion says something that is disliked, they could be arrested, yet if say a group like the KKK say the same thing and continues killing people, the government does nothing about this.

    Why is it that people from another faith, can be part of the KKK and openly admit to persecuting people for their race and religion, and our governments do nothing to stop them, while innocent Muslims are often sent to jail without due cause?

    Those are just a few of my thoughts. I also recognize there are so many great people of other faiths out there, who do feel the same way I do, and not everyone whether they are a Muslim, Christian, Jew or other faith are extremists. There is good in all people, but conversely many people are evil, and this evil is not limited to a single people or religion.

    • Enlightened: I’m very pleased with your insightful input that integrated with what I wrote.

      The problem, my friend and brother, is not merely in people’s faith (whatever) but mainly is stereotyping and this is the case with Muslims, before 9/11 generally and after 9/11 especially.

      It’s awful how the mass react regarding others who don’t share them the same believes either spiritually or socially, however history reveal that this attitude is common because they don’t take a pause to think about whether what they have perceived is this true or false!

Sorry, comments for this entry are closed. You are welcomed to comment on from your blog/website.